Selected Work in Progress

Wind of Change? Cultural Determinants of Maternal Labor Supplywith Barbara Boelmann and Uta Schönberg  (version March 2022, older version: CEPR WP)

Revise & Resubmit at American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

Coverage: New York TimesIndependent The ConversationLa RepubblicaZeitSüddeutsche ZeitungFrankfurter Allgemeine ZeitungHandelsblatt WELT – Tagesspiegel (Print) – MDRntvQMUL NewsUCL NewsIFS Deaton Review on InequalityTimes
Press Release (in German) Summary (in German)

“The Impact of family friendly workplace policies on gender inequalities” with Julian Costas Fernandez, Sebastian Findeisen, and Uta Schönberg

“The effects of Wartime Sexual Violence” with Barbara Petrongolo and Viola Salvestrini

“Gender based violence and the evolution of gender norms” with Ezgi Kurt and Tim Lee (funded by BA/Leverhulme Small Research Grant)

Published papers

Who benefits from universal childcare? Estimating marginal returns to early childcare attendance with Thomas Cornelissen, Christian Dustmann and Uta Schönberg (Cream Discussion Paper version)

Journal of Political Economy, 2018, 126 (6), 2356-2409.

Coverage: Spiegel (print) – FAZ iNewsLibération – UCL News – QMUL NewsVoxEU –  ÖkonomenstimmeMakronom
Pressemitteilung auf Deutsch  Press release 


In this paper, we examine the heterogeneous treatment effects of a universal child care (preschool) program in Germany by exploiting the exogenous variation in attendance caused by a reform that led to a large staggered expansion across municipalities. Drawing on unique administrative data from the full population of compulsory school entry examinations, we find that children with lower (observed and unobserved) gains are more likely to select into child care than children with higher gains. This pattern of reverse selection on gains is driven by unobserved family background characteristics: children from disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to attend child care than children from advantaged backgrounds but have larger treatment effects because of their worse outcome when not enrolled in child care.

Can financial incentives reduce the baby gap? Evidence from a reform in maternity leave benefits” (older version: NBER WP)

Journal of Public Economics, 2019, 169, 203-222.

This paper was presented with a CESifo Distinguished Affiliate Award in Employment and Social Protection 2016, a UWIN Best Paper Award on Gender Economics 2015 and a FEEM Award (now Young Economist Award) at the EEA 2014.
Coverage: New York Times –  Working Mother –  CESifo – WAPP-Wire Harvard Kennedy School – Corriere della Sera –  COSME
For a an interview after the EEA presentation, see, and a shorter interview by the Fundación Ramón Areces during the COSME 2016 workshop:


To assess whether earnings-dependent maternity leave positively impacts fertility and narrows the baby gap between high educated (high earning) and low educated (low earning) women, I exploit a major maternity leave benefit reform in Germany that considerably increases the financial incentives for higher educated and higher earning women to have a child. In particular, I use the large differential changes in maternity leave benefits across education and income groups to estimate the effects on fertility up to 5 years post reform. In addition to demonstrating an up to 22% increase in the fertility of tertiary educated versus low educated women, I find a positive, statistically significant effect of increased benefits on fertility, driven mainly by women at the middle and upper end of the education and income distributions. Overall, the results suggest that earnings-dependent maternity leave benefits, which compensate women commensurate with their opportunity cost of childbearing, could successfully reduce the fertility rate disparity related to mothers’ education and earnings.

“From LATE to MTE: Alternative Methods for the Evaluation of Policy Interventions” with Thomas Cornelissen, Christian Dustmann and Uta Schönberg (PDF)

Accompanying Slides for Teaching (PDF)

Labour Economics, 2016, Vol. 41, 47-60


This paper provides an introduction into the estimation of Marginal Treatment Effects (MTE). Compared to the existing surveys on the subject, our paper is less technical and speaks to the applied economist with a solid basic understanding of econometric techniques who would like to use MTE estimation. Our framework of analysis is a generalized Roy model based on the potential outcomes framework, within which we define different treatment effects of interest, and review the well-known case of IV estimation with a discrete instrument resulting in a local average treatment effect (LATE). Turning to IV estimation with a continuous instrument we demonstrate that the 2SLS estimator may be viewed as a weighted average of LATEs, and discuss MTE estimation as an alternative and more informative way of exploiting a continuous instrument. We clarify the assumptions underlying the MTE framework, its relation to the correlated random coefficients model, and illustrate how the MTE estimation is implemented in practice.